May 19, 2011 •
Governor Requests Lobbyists’ Contracts Terminated
Rhode Island’s Quasi-Public Agencies
Governor Lincoln Chafee has sent letters to the directors of Rhode Island’s 17 quasi-public agencies requesting, among other things, they terminate non-critical contracts with lobbyists. He is also requesting any procurement activities by these agencies be open and transparent, instructing the agencies to post all procurement rules and regulations applicable to each agency’s contract practices on a public website.
Governor Chafee indicates the purpose of the letters is to help find cost reductions that are available through increased efficiency and productivity, stating, “Under my appointment authority I take very seriously the responsibility of placing highly qualified individuals who strive to ensure value in the services provided by our quasi-public agencies.”
Some of the quasi-public agencies include the Rhode Island Industrial-Recreational Building Authority, the Rhode Island Airport Corporation, and the Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corporation.
May 18, 2011 •
New Ethics Rules for Chicago
On Monday, May 16th Mayor Rahm Emanuel signed three new executive orders and reissued three additional executive orders.
The three reissued executive orders include a ban on political contributions to the mayor from the owners of companies that do business with the city, an order requiring city employees to comply with hiring oversight rules, and an order reaffirming that it is the duty of every city employee to report wrongdoing to the inspector general.
The first new executive order prohibits new appointees from lobbying city government for two years after leaving the administration, bars lower level employees from lobbying the departments or agencies in which they work, and bars appointees to boards and commissions from lobbying the board or commission on which they sit.
The second new executive order protects city employees from being pressured to give gifts or make political contributions to their superiors.
The third new executive order prohibits city lobbyists from making political contributions to the mayor.
May 13, 2011 •
Revolving Door Loophole Exposed
West Virginia’s ethics panel decided the law does not include independent contractors.
The West Virginia Ethics Commission has concluded it cannot prevent an employee of the Legislature from avoiding the state’s newly passed “revolving door” ban if he changes his status from an employee to an independent contractor before the law takes effect on July 1, 2011.
Under the pending law, elected officials and certain high-ranking unelected employees will be forbidden from acting as lobbyists for one year after leaving public employment. The commission decided this law does not include independent contractors.
This decision comes after a request for an opinion by legislative counsel Donnie Adkins. The commission said it “is troubled” by the proposed maneuver but would be unable to bring him within the revolving door ban as an independent contractor.
The West Virginia Ethics Commission offers the opinion on their website.
Here is the Charleston Gazette’s coverage in the story, “Ethics loophole a cause of concern” by Phil Kabler.
May 13, 2011 •
Providence Lobby Law Pushed Back to July 1
Date Change
RHODE ISLAND: The Providence Lobbying Disclosure Ordinance, which was to take effect May 16, will now take effect July 1. The City Council’s Committee on Finance amended the March 11 ordinance extending the time to begin the implementation of the regulations. The new ordinance requires lobbyist registration, reporting, ID badges, and penalties.
This report refers to the March 23 Lobby Comply post “Providence Creates Lobbying Registration Law” by George Ticoras.
Photo of the Providence, R.I. skyline by boliyou on Wikipedia.
May 11, 2011 •
Amended Rules Concerning Lobbyist Regulation Released in Colorado
New Lobbying Rules Clarify Previously Vague Provisions
The office of the Secretary of State has released an amended version of the Rules Concerning Lobbyist Regulation, 8 CCR 1505-8. The newly amended rules now include an expanded definition of the term “bona fide personal emergency” to be used in conjunction with determining whether a professional lobbyist or lobbyist firm will be granted a waiver or reduction of an imposed fine, as well as provisions for the suspension, revocation, or other action concerning a lobbyist’s certificate of registration.
The amended rules also include additional guidance to be used by a professional lobbyist for a not-for-profit organization seeking a waiver of the filing fee for the professional lobbyist registration statement.
Finally, amendments were made concerning electronic filing of registration and disclosure statements, noting any statement presented for manual filing with the Secretary of State will not be accepted, but a computer terminal will now be made available in the main office to allow lobbyists to electronically file.
May 10, 2011 •
GAO’s 2010 Report on Lobbying Compliance
Findings Reported
A report released by the Government Accountability Office reveals disclosure reporting terminology and reporting requirements are a challenge for some lobbyists. The 2010 Lobbying Disclosure Observations on Lobbyists’ Compliance with Disclosure Requirements also found some lobbyists lacked clarity in determining what constitutes a lobbying activity versus a non-lobbying activity. Generally, however, the findings in the report, which were substantially the same as prior reports, show lobbyists as a whole complying with disclosure and reporting requirements.
The GAO is required by law to prepare reports determining the efficacy of lobbying compliance and reporting, and identify any challenges to compliance. This is their fourth report.
May 5, 2011 •
Ask the Experts – Rules When Accompanying a Registered Lobbyist
Here is your chance to “Ask the Experts” at State and Federal Communications, Inc.
Q: I am a registered lobbyist. Can a company executive and/or expert accompany me to meetings with public officials without needing to register?
A: In most instances, individuals are not “insulated” from registration by engaging in lobbying activities in the presence of a registered lobbyist. California is an example of an exception to this rule. In California, an individual does not engage in direct communication when he meets or speaks with a qualifying official in the company of a registered lobbyist retained by the individual’s employer, or by a bona fide trade association or membership organization of which the individual’s employer is a member.
The answer will to depend on the jurisdiction’s registration thresholds. Often times, executives and experts will not have to register because their involvement will not meet the compensation, time, or expenditure threshold in the given jurisdiction. For example, in Connecticut, the expert would have to receive $2,000 in compensation in a calendar year before having to register. A one-time meeting with public officials would probably not exceed this threshold. Likewise, in Massachusetts, there is a statutory presumption that an individual is not a lobbyist if he spends 25 hours or less and receives less than $2,500 for lobbying efforts during any semi-annual reporting period.
The context and content of the conversation are also important in determining whether registration is required. If the executive and/or expert are merely providing testimony at a public hearing, most often this will not be considered lobbying and he will not be required to register. In some cases, as in Arizona, there are exceptions for individuals providing technical information to public officials.
It is always important to remember the “title” of the person is not relevant in determining whether he or she needs to register as a lobbyist in any given jurisdiction.
You can directly submit questions for this feature, and we will select those most appropriate and answer them here. Send your questions to: marketing@stateandfed.com.
(We are always available to answer questions from clients that are specific to your needs, and we encourage you to continue to call or e-mail us with questions about your particular company or organization. As always, we will confidentially and directly provide answers or information you need.) Our replies to your questions are not legal advice. Instead, these replies represent our analysis of laws, rules, and regulations.
April 28, 2011 •
Iowa News Update
Governor Terry Branstad signed House File 126 into law on Tuesday.
This law, taking effect on July 1, 2011, requires lobbyist registration and reporting only with the legislative branch.
Lobbyists will indicate on this registration whether they will also engage in lobbying executive officials.
Employer reports will still be due each July 31st.
Photo of Governor Branstad courtesy of the official website for the Office of the Governor.
April 27, 2011 •
Lobbying News from Iowa
Lobbyists in the Hawkeye State may soon have a streamlined registration and reporting process.
House File 126 has passed both houses of the Iowa Legislature and now awaits approval from Governor Terry Branstad.
This bill would change the state’s law to require lobbyists to register and report with the legislative branch only; currently there is separate registration and reporting for the legislative and executive branches.
Lobbyists would indicate on the registrations whether they will lobby executive officials in addition to lawmakers. Lobbyists would have a combined annual report due each July 31st and registration would open in December for the following calendar year.
April 25, 2011 •
Tennessee Senate Bill 1227 Becomes Law
Bill Signed by Governor Alters Reporting Dates for Employer Disclosure Reports
Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam has signed into law Senate Bill 1227, which revises the filing dates for lobbyist employer disclosure reports.
The bill requires that employer disclosure reports be filed within 45 days of June 30 and December 31.
The new law takes effect July 1, 2011, with the first employer disclosure report under the new law covering the time period from April 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 having a filing deadline of February 14, 2012.
Photo of Governor Bill Haslam courtesy of the Tennessee Governor’s website.
April 21, 2011 •
Highlighted Site of the Week – Women in Government Relations
Advancing and Empowering Women
This week our Highlighted Site of the Week is Women in Government Relations (WGR). The site was referred to me by Rebecca South, who is a Federal Compliance Associate at State and Federal Communications. Rebecca has been a member of Women in Government Relations for seven years.
The group is doing amazing work that deserves attention. Spend some time on the their website and you’ll see how active they are. The group was founded in 1975 and boasts a membership of over 750 women and men from many places in the profession. According to the site, there are 65 U.S. Representatives and seven U.S. Senators who are WGR Emeritus members.
The organization’s goal: “WGR is committed to the advancement and empowerment of women at all career levels of government relations. By offering leadership opportunities, mentoring, partnerships, networking and educational programming, WGR cultivates our members’ personal and professional growth.”
Women in Government Relations offers programs and workshops, as well as a mentoring program and professional internships. They also have a WGR Toastmasters group where members are given the opportunity to improve their public speaking skills. Their website has a career center where job seekers can meet employers online.
The WGR calendar is full with their Signature Events like the Charity Golf Tournament, the Emeritus Member Tea, the Charity Scavenger Hunt (sending members all over Washington, D.C. looking for clues), the Spring Gala, and much more!
Another great resource for members is the WGR Task Forces and Working Groups: “In addition to annual events, WGR hosts regular briefings, roundtables, and panel discussions as well as brown bag luncheons with policymakers and other government affairs professionals.”
WGR’s website is rich with information, but if you want the latest news, I suggest connecting with them via social media. You can find their Facebook here and you can join their LinkedIn Group here.
April 19, 2011 •
Lobbyist Registration Fees on Rise in Texas?
Bill Containing Potential Lobbyist Registration Fee Increase Moving Through House
House Bill 3653, a bill concerning lobbyist registration fees, was brought before the House Appropriations Committee on Monday, April 18, 2011, as the bill moves closer to a vote before the full House.
The bill would provide for lobbyist registration fees of up to $1,000; however, lobbyist registration fees of up to $200 would be assessed if the lobbyist is employed by a 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(4) organization.
If passed, the bill provides for an effective date of September 1, 2011.
Photo of the Texas State Capitol by LoneStarMike on Wikipedia.
April 15, 2011 •
Georgia Ethics Bill Approved by Legislature on Final Day of Session
Georgia Legislators Vote to Patch Ethics Loophole as Session Ends
The Georgia General Assembly adjourned late Thursday, April 14, 2011. Among the measures passed on the final legislative day was Senate Bill 160, requiring lobbyist reporting of expenditures made on behalf or for the benefit of a public employee for the purpose of influencing a public officer. The measure will now be sent to the desk of Governor Nathan Deal for his signature.
Senate Bill 160 was amended earlier in the week to close a loophole in state ethics law made public after Advisory Opinion 2011-03, released by the Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission, concluded state law did not require the reporting of such expenditures.
The final semi-monthly disclosure report for state level lobbyists will be due May 1, 2011. Further, the first monthly disclosure report for state level lobbyists will be due June 5, 2011.
Photo of the Georgia State Capitol dome by Connor.carey on Wikipedia.
April 14, 2011 •
West Virginia Ethics Bill Passes
Acting Governor Tomblin signed House Bill 2464 into law late last week.
This ethics bill, which takes effect on July 1, 2011, prohibits members of the state legislature, elected executive branch officials, agency heads, and certain other appointed officials from acting as lobbyists for one year after leaving office.
Additionally, this legislation will require a public official who files financial disclosure statements to reveal employment information and other “business interests” of his or her spouse.
The spousal disclosures are designed to shine light on additional conflicts of interest an official may have even without a personal stake in a matter.
Photo of the West Virginia State Capitol by Garkeith on Wikipedia.
State and Federal Communications, Inc. provides research and consulting services for government relations professionals on lobbying laws, procurement lobbying laws, political contribution laws in the United States and Canada. Learn more by visiting stateandfed.com.