November 9, 2010 •
Court Rules Louisiana Ethics Board Must Refer Violations
Public Hearing for Late Filing of Campaign Reports
The 19th Judicial District Court of Baton Rouge has ruled the Ethics Board cannot enforce penalties for campaign finance violations. The court found a separate Ethics Adjudicatory Board must conduct public hearings when the Ethics Board alleges the late filing of, or absence of filing, campaign reports.
The Ethics Board had argued campaign violations requiring investigations were already referred to the Ethics Adjudicatory Board, but cases involving the mere failure to file reports on time, or not at all, did not require any investigation, and therefore did not require a separate hearing. The division of giving the Ethics Board investigatory and prosecutorial authority, while giving the Ethics Adjudicatory Board judicial power, comes from a 2008 change in the law meant to streamline the regulatory process.
November 9, 2010 •
Minnesota Board Releases Advisory Opinion
Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board Issues Advisory Opinion to Clarify Lobbyist Registration Requirement
The Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board issued Advisory Opinion 413 clarifying the state’s lobbyist registration requirements. The Board sought to answer whether a lobbyist is required to register multiple times when employed by an entity which consists of a parent company and a number of affiliates, including subsidiaries and joint ventures controlled by or under common ownership and control of the parent company.
Several of the affiliates have legislative and administrative interests in Minnesota, and lobbying is conducted on their behalf. The Board concluded that a lobbyist must register on behalf of each association whose interests they promote, regardless of the mechanism used to retain or direct the efforts of the lobbyists. The opinion continued that a lobbyist who represents an association such as a trade or business association is not required to register separately for each member of the association.
Photo of the Minnesota State Capitol by Mulad on Wikipedia.
November 9, 2010 •
Ask the Experts – 2011 Lobbying Registrations
Here is your chance to “Ask the Experts” at State and Federal Communications, Inc.
Q. I am registered in numerous states. What are some of the features I need to know regarding renewing my lobbyist registrations for 2011? Do all my registrations automatically expire at the end of the year? H-E-L-P!
A. These are all very good questions, as January 1, 2011 is quickly approaching. The expirations on December 31 of this year are particularly thorny because they include not only those states having annual expirations, but most biennial expirations occur at the end of an even-numbered year.
As the states begin their 2011 legislative sessions, here are some things to keep in mind:
Annual registrations: The majority of states have a registration term based on a calendar year. If registered in any of the following states, your registration will expire on December 31, 2010.
Alabama Mississippi Alaska Missouri Arkansas Nebraska District of Columbia New Hampshire Florida [legislative and executive] New Mexico Georgia North Carolina Idaho [legislative and executive] Ohio [executive] Illinois Oklahoma Indiana [legislative and executive] Rhode Island [legislative] Iowa [legislative] South Carolina Kansas Tennessee Louisiana [legislative and executive] Texas Massachusetts Biennial registrations: The trick to keeping track of your registration expiration for biennial states is knowing whether the biennium ends on December 31st of an even-numbered or odd-numbered year.
Those states with biennial registrations expiring on December 31, 2010, include:
California Pennsylvania Connecticut Utah Hawaii Vermont Montana Washington New York West Virginia Ohio [legislative] Wisconsin Legislative sessions: In some states, registrations expire at the end of the regular legislative session. These include Nevada [sessions are held in odd-numbered years] and South Dakota. In Iowa, executive branch lobbyist registration is valid until the next regular session of the general assembly.
Non-calendar years: In other states, registrations expire at the end of a year, but that year is defined as other than January 1 to December 31. These states have the following registration terms:
Colorado [July 1 to July 15 of the subsequent year] North Dakota [July 1 to June 30] Kentucky executive [August 1 to July 31] Virginia [May 1 to April 30] Maine [December 1 to November 30] Wyoming [May 1 to April 30] Maryland [November 1 to October 31] On-going registrations: Once you register in the following states, your registration is on-going until you affirmatively terminate. These include:
Delaware
Federal
Michigan
Minnesota
New Jersey [a fee is due annually on November 15]
Rhode Island executiveAnd then there is Arizona: Just to keep you on your toes, Arizona has a biennial registration where lobbyists renew during November of odd-numbered years, and employers renew during November of even-numbered years.
November 8, 2010 •
Mass. OCPF to host Campaign Finance Seminar
The agency will offer instruction and take your questions regarding campaign finance law.
The Office of Campaign and Political Finance (OCPF) will host a campaign finance seminar on Wednesday, November 10, 2010 at the OCPF offices located at One Ashburton Place, Room 411 in Boston. Topics under discussion include but are not limited to: filing and disclosure requirements for all types of candidates, PACs and other committees; the application of the campaign finance law to political activity by public employees, including the restriction on employees’ fundraising and on fundraising in government buildings; restrictions on the use of public resources to influence voters in ballot question elections on the local level, and electronic filing.
The seminar begins at 2 p.m. Reservations are not required.
November 8, 2010 •
Governor-Elect Sets Sights on Ethics Reform
Promises come in response to scandal connected with gambling legislation.
Alabama Governor-elect Robert Bentley wasted no time in declaring ethics reform a top priority when he assumes office in 2011. Bentley stated his preference is to hold a special session of the state legislature within the regular session, scheduled to convene in February, because it would save the taxpayers money.
Bentley’s goals for the special session include increased frequency of reporting political contributions and online publishing of the contributions. The promises of sweeping ethics reform come on the heels of a scandal in which state senators and lobbyists have been charged with bribery and corruption in connection with pending gambling legislation.
This photo of Robert Bentley is is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license by Zwilson14.
November 5, 2010 •
$400,000 for Pay-to-Play
New Jersey Offers Help – With Conditions
In order for the borough of North Arlington to receive $400,000, it must implement pay-to-play laws as one of the conditions for the state’s Transitional Aid to Localities program, which awards grants to the most fiscally challenged municipalities.
Mayor Peter Massa has signed a memorandum of understanding which mandates the borough council pass ordinances limiting awarding public contracts to businesses that have made contributions. Businesses actively contracting with the borough would also be limited from making contributions.
The council has three months to pass the ordinances, in addition to implementing other financial restrictions such as staff reductions and salary freezes, in order to receive the funds.
November 5, 2010 •
Highlighted Site of the Week – The Political Graveyard
“The Internet’s Most Comprehensive Source of U.S. Political Biography, or, The Web Site That Tells Where the Dead Politicians are Buried”
I know Halloween has passed, but this week I invite all of you to hang out in a graveyard – a political graveyard, anyway. You won’t find ghosts and goblins at The Political Graveyard Web site, but you will find a trove of political figures past and present – everything the political enthusiasts and experts of American history and politics could need for hours of fun.
The Political Graveyard claims to be “the Internet’s most comprehensive free source for American political biography, listing 217,078 politicians, living and dead.” I believe it. The site was created by Lawrence Kestenbaum, who has put a great deal of time, intelligence, and loving care into the project.
If you already know a politician you would like to look up, say – Theodore Roosevelt, former U.S. Rep. James Traficant, or Harold Stassen, the former Governor of Minnesota who ran for president of the United States nine times, you could use the Alphabetical Index of Politicians. But The Political Graveyard offers many other lists from which to choose that show far more imagination. Consider browsing through the lists of politicians who lost the most elections, who died in office, who survived assassination attempts, or those who participated in dueling!
You can find politicians who were Rhodes Scholars, played professional sports, been up in space, or were born in slavery. Or how about the ones who received a Nobel Prize, a Pulitzer Prize, or an Olympic Medal?
Gender, religious background, occupation (yes the lobbyists are listed), and ancestry groups are there. Freemasons, Rotary, Elks, Knights of Columbus, and Knights Templar. It is all there.
Pure fun! Well, I think I have found a new pastime …
Screen captures courtesy of Lawrence Kestenbaum and The Political Graveyard.
November 4, 2010 •
Utah Voters Approve New Legislative Ethics Commission
Amendment takes effect in 2011
On November 2nd, voters approved Constitutional Amendment D by a vote of 67 percent for to 33 percent against. Amendment D establishes a five-member legislative ethics commission with the authority to conduct an independent review of complaints alleging unethical legislative behavior.
The ultimate decision whether to punish or expel a member of either the House or Senate would remain with the member’s chamber. The amendment also prohibits sitting members of the legislature or registered lobbyists from serving on the new commission.
Amendment D takes effect on January 1, 2011.
November 4, 2010 •
Voters Approve Changes to New York City Charter
New York City Voters Approve New Law Requiring Disclosure of Independent Expenditures
New York City voters supported, by a vote of 83 percent to 17 percent with 87 percent of precincts reporting, a referendum item which called for several changes to the city charter. The changes include requiring disclosure of campaign contributions by independent groups and raising the maximum fine for violating conflicts of interest law. Currently, people and organizations that spend money independently of any candidate to support or oppose political candidates or to influence votes in a referendum are not required to report those expenditures publicly.
The new voter approved law requires any individual or group that spends $1,000 or more to support or oppose a candidate or referendum to disclose the expenditure to the city’s Campaign Finance Board and include in any literature the name of any individual or organization that paid for it. The law also requires any group spending $5,000 or more to support or oppose a candidate to disclose any organizations that made contributions to that group and any individual who contributed $1,000 or more during the 12-month period preceding the election.
Photo of the New York City Municipal Building by Momos on Wikipedia.
November 4, 2010 •
Voters Approve Campaign Finance Charter Reform
On November 2nd, 2010, Akron voters, by a margin of nearly 56 percent in favor to 44 percent against, approved Issue 14 amending the city charter’s campaign finance provisions.
City council now has 90 days to pass a new ordinance which will implement the charter amendment language. Campaign finance contribution limits will increase to $200 for ward candidates and $450 for city-wide candidates. It is anticipated the new legislation will require council to review, and if necessary, amend, the city’s campaign finance legislation every two years beginning in 2012.
A provision is also expected to be made which will allow for public comment on any proposed changes to the city’s campaign finance rules. Finally, the legislation is expected to remove the city’s campaign finance language from the city charter itself. Going forward, campaign finance regulations will be authorized by ordinance.
November 3, 2010 •
Oklahoma Ethics Commission Releases Updated Proposed Rule Changes
The Oklahoma Ethics Commission has issued a draft of proposed changes to the state’s campaign finance rules.
Under the process in place for changing these rules, the proposals will be sent to the state legislature who will either approve or override them. The approved rules become law on July 1 of each year.
The highlights of this year’s proposals include changes to bring Oklahoma law into compliance with the U.S. Supreme Court’s “Citizens United” decision, and the abrogation of a rule restricting PAC contributions to ballot-measure committees. The restrictions on contributions to ballot committees have not been enforced in several years because they are unconstitutional.
Photo of the Oklahoma State Capitol copyright © Caleb Long on Wikipedia.
November 3, 2010 •
Montana Contribution Law Challenged Again
Tea Party Organization Seeks to Further Topple Montana Campaign Contribution Law
Montana Shrugged, a tea party group, filed suit Thursday in U.S. District Court in Billings, naming as defendants the state political practices commissioner and Attorney General Steve Bullock. The lawsuit, filed with the help of the James Madison Center for Free Speech in Terre Haute, Ind., says Montana laws requiring financial reporting by political committees and corporations are unconstitutionally vague.
Montana Attorney General Bullock stated the lawsuit is part of a nationwide plot to torpedo state laws that require public reporting on who funds political campaigns. The lawsuit specifically challenges Montana’s restrictions on corporate contributions after a Montana court ruling last month overturned a law barring corporate independent expenditures and upheld the state’s restrictions on corporate contributions to political candidates.
Photo of the State capitol in Helena by Monty Johnson on Wikipedia.
November 3, 2010 •
Utah Lt. Governor Revises Campaign Finance Disclosure Guidance for Parties
A media review of major Utah county political parties recently revealed 71 percent had failed to file the financial disclosure statements supposedly required of them by August 31.
Now, Lt. Governor Greg Bell has informed the county parties they are not required to file. Going forward, only registered political parties will be required to file financial disclosure statements. Under state law, county parties are not required to register with the state. This new guidance runs contrary to previous statements which said all state and county parties were required to file disclosure statements.
The Salt Lake County Democratic Party has indicated it disagrees with the decision by the Lt. Governor’s office and plans to pursue the matter further. At this time, though, its legal options are unclear as the Utah Supreme Court has so far refused to hear their case. For its part, the Lt. Governor’s office plans to ask the legislature this coming January for a change in state law reflecting the new disclosure decision.
November 2, 2010 •
Federal Judge Denies Injunction Against Florida PAC Statute
U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle denied a request for a preliminary injunction against a Florida law that requires two or more people who want to contribute or expend $500 on a ballot issue to form a political action committee.
The plaintiffs, four Sarasota, Florida residents seeking to pool their monetary resources to buy radio ads against a proposed state constitutional amendment on the November ballot, wanted to avoid registration as a political action committee and disclosure requirements required of their desired radio advertisement.
“This ruling means that our clients will not be able to speak freely in the 2010 election,” said Paul Sherman, attorney for The Institute for Justice, who represented the plaintiffs.
For the complete story, here are two articles:
“Judge won’t block Fla. campaign law enforcement,” by Bill Kaczor in the Miami Herald.
“Judge refuses to throw out political-committee requirement of campaign finance law,” from the Central Florida Political Pulse blog on the Orlando Sentinel.
Photo of the Old Florida Capitol building by Diligent Terrier on Wikipedia.
State and Federal Communications, Inc. provides research and consulting services for government relations professionals on lobbying laws, procurement lobbying laws, political contribution laws in the United States and Canada. Learn more by visiting stateandfed.com.