August 13, 2014 •
State Republican Parties Challenge SEC Pay-to-Play Rule
The Republican parties of New York and Tennessee have filed suit in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia challenging Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 206(4)-5. The plaintiffs allege the rule, which imposes restrictions upon investment advisors and […]
The Republican parties of New York and Tennessee have filed suit in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia challenging Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 206(4)-5. The plaintiffs allege the rule, which imposes restrictions upon investment advisors and their covered associates making contributions to officials of state and local government entities, violates the freedom of speech protections of the First Amendment.
The suit also takes the position that the SEC does not have the authority to regulate campaign contributions.
If struck down, the elimination of the rule would make it easier for any state governor making a run for president to raise money from the financial sector.
June 25, 2014 •
SEC Charges Firm with Pay-to-Play Violation
For the first time, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged a firm with violations of its pay-to-play rules. On June 20, the SEC charged TL Ventures Inc., a private equity firm, with receiving advisory fees from the […]
For the first time, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged a firm with violations of its pay-to-play rules. On June 20, the SEC charged TL Ventures Inc., a private equity firm, with receiving advisory fees from the pension funds of both Philadelphia and Pennsylvania after an associate of the firm had made campaign contributions in 2011 to the governor and a candidate for mayor.
Federal regulations prohibit investment advisers and their covered associates who make contributions to officials of state and local government entities from providing compensatory advisory services for two years following a campaign contribution. TL Ventures Inc. has agreed to settle the charges by paying nearly $300,000.
February 25, 2014 •
Bergen County, NJ Reforms Pay-to-Play
By a vote of 6-1, the Bergen County Board of Freeholders has, for the second time in less than a year, reformed the county’s pay-to-play laws. Essentially reversing the May 2013 bill, Monday’s resolution lowers the allowed contribution from no-bid […]
By a vote of 6-1, the Bergen County Board of Freeholders has, for the second time in less than a year, reformed the county’s pay-to-play laws.
Essentially reversing the May 2013 bill, Monday’s resolution lowers the allowed contribution from no-bid county contractors from $5,200 to $2,000.
Freeholder John Felice, the only individual to vote against the bill, worries it may result in only wealthy citizens running for office.
January 24, 2014 •
DC Council Bill Would Disqualify Campaign Contributors from City Contracts
Phil Mendelson, the chairman of the Council of the District of Columbia, introduced a bill that would bar people who made political contributions from obtaining contracts or doing other business with the city. Mendelson said the motivation behind his bill […]
Phil Mendelson, the chairman of the Council of the District of Columbia, introduced a bill that would bar people who made political contributions from obtaining contracts or doing other business with the city.
Mendelson said the motivation behind his bill was to end the perception of pay-to-play in Washington, D.C.
January 21, 2014 •
Bergen County Freeholders to Reconsider Pay-to-Play
By a vote of 6-1, the Bergen County Board of Freeholders introduced a resolution to reverse last year’s pay-to-play ordinance. The resolution would lower the allowed campaign contribution from no-bid contractors from $5,200 to $2,000. County Executive Kathleen Donovan vetoed […]
By a vote of 6-1, the Bergen County Board of Freeholders introduced a resolution to reverse last year’s pay-to-play ordinance.
The resolution would lower the allowed campaign contribution from no-bid contractors from $5,200 to $2,000.
County Executive Kathleen Donovan vetoed last year’s limits but is said to support the latest introduced changes.
November 27, 2013 •
San Francisco Ethics Commission Passes Pay-to-Play Regulation
The Ethics Commission has approved a regulation providing a method for candidates and campaign committees to comply with due diligence requirements of the pay-to-play restrictions. Code section 1.126 prohibits a city or county contractor from contributing to a candidate who […]
The Ethics Commission has approved a regulation providing a method for candidates and campaign committees to comply with due diligence requirements of the pay-to-play restrictions.
Code section 1.126 prohibits a city or county contractor from contributing to a candidate who can determine whether a contract is awarded.
Regulation 1.126-7 will require the contributor to certify he or she is not an not an owner, director, officer, or named subcontractor of any entity currently negotiating or recently awarded a contract with the city, county, or other covered agency.
The regulation is effective January 24, 2014.
August 29, 2013 •
DuPage County Eliminates Pay-to-Play Restrictions
Laws were found to be unenforceable
The DuPage County Board repealed its pay-to-play provisions after learning from the state’s attorney’s office the provisions were unenforceable. As a non-home rule county, the county did not have the power to act on limiting campaign contributions because it was not specifically granted that power by the state legislature.
The changes were enacted as part of an otherwise minor update to the county’s ethics code. Provisions requiring disclosure of campaign contributions by contractors remain in place.
August 7, 2013 •
Los Angeles County California Treasurer Announces Pay-to-Play Restriction
County no longer will do business with banks contributing to school bond campaigns
Treasurer Mark J. Saladino announced his office will no longer do business with securities brokers making political contributions to school bond campaigns. The pay-to-play policy is an attempt to prevent campaign donations from influencing the hiring of underwriters by school districts. The policy is also expected to increase competition between dealers and save taxpayer dollars.
Under the new policy, underwriters must not donate to school bond measures if they want to qualify for the treasurer’s list of investment banks and securities dealers eligible to sell county bonds. The restriction applies to monetary donations, non-monetary contributions, and pre-election services.
In statewide surveys, virtually every securities broker hired by a school district contributed to the district’s bond campaign and was retained without competitive bidding. A recent study focusing on California school bond issues found post-election fees paid to underwriters making contributions were on average $27,576 more than those paid to brokers not contributing.
August 5, 2013 •
Monday News Roundup
Let’s start off the week with these lobbying, campaign finance, and ethics news articles:
Lobbying
“August recess now high season for interests lobbying lawmakers” by Matea Gold in The Washington Post.
Massachusetts: “Mass. casino lobbying tapering off on Beacon Hill as firms train money on host communities” by Steve LeBlanc (Associated Press) in The Republic.
Oklahoma: “Freshman Oklahoma lawmaker top recipient of lobbyist attention” by Michael McNutt in The Oklahoman.
Wisconsin: “Lobbying spending by public unions drops sharply” by The Associated Press in the Miami Herald.
Campaign Finance
“Report: Dead donors gave $586K” by Tal Kopan in Politico.
Texas: “New Open-Source Tool Gives Texans Faster Access to Campaign Finance Data” by Miranda Neubauer in TechPresident.
Ethics
“Congressional Pressure on FEC Criticized” by Kent Cooper in Roll Call.
Maryland: “Ethics complaint questions Vallario’s dual roles as legislator and lawyer” by John Wagner in The Washington Post.
Oklahoma: “Outdated software plagues Oklahoma Ethics Commission” by Michael McNutt in The Oklahoman.
Pay-to-Play
New Jersey: “Bill would close loophole in N.J. pay-to-play law” by Claudia Vargas in the Philadelphia Inquirer.
Government Tech and Social Media
“Georgia Saving Millions with Open Source Technology” by Brian Heaton in Government Technology.
From the State Legislatures
“The rise of one-party rule in the states” by Craig Gilbert in the Journal Sentinel.
California: “Lawmakers make final push” by Melody Gutierrez in The Sacramento Bee.
California: “Crunch time: Deals loom as clock ticks” by Greg Lucas in Capitol Weekly.
California: “Assembly returns without supermajority” by Christopher Arns in the Sacramento Business Journal.
May 21, 2013 •
Alabama Legislature Adjourns
Passes major campaign finance changes on final day
The Alabama Legislature adjourned just before midnight on Monday, May 20, 2013, but not before passing major changes to the state’s Fair Campaign Practices Act.
The most significant change is the elimination of limits on corporate contributions to candidates and political action committees. Under the new law, corporations will be permitted to contribute in the same manner as individuals, who are not subject to any contribution limits, with the exception of retaining the state’s pay-to-play prohibition on contributions to the Public Service Commission by utilities the commission regulates. The bill also makes 527 organizations subject to the ban on PAC-to-PAC transfers and adds enforcement and penalty provisions.
The Secretary of State’s Office will release information regarding the effective date of these provisions since the law must first receive Department of Justice preclearance before it becomes enforceable.
May 16, 2013 •
Bergen County, NJ Board Overrides Executive’s Veto on Pay-to-Play Legislation
Freeholder Ordinance 13-06
On May 15, the Bergen County, New Jersey Board of Chosen Freeholders voted to override County Executive Kathleen A. Donovan’s veto of the new pay-to-play ordinance that passed on May 1.
This is the second pay-to-play ordinance vetoed by the county executive in the last eight months. On October 5, 2012, Donovan had vetoed a prior pay-to-play measure passed by the Board.
Freeholder Ordinance 13-06 changes the code to include lowering the debarment period for future county contracts from four years to one year. Under the new ordinance, contractors will also be able to make political contributions up to $5,200 to county political parties.
According to NorthJersey.com, another vote on the ordinance is required because the public notice for the legislation was not properly published. The board next meets on Wednesday, May 22.
May 13, 2013 •
A Second Veto for a Second Pay-to-Play Ordinance in Bergen County, NJ
Freeholder Ordinance 13-06
Bergen County, New Jersey County Executive Kathleen A. Donovan has vetoed the Board of Chosen Freeholders’ new pay-to-play ordinance that passed on May 1.
This is the second pay-to-play ordinance vetoed by the county executive in the last eight months. On October 5, 2012, Donovan had vetoed a prior pay-to-play measure passed by the Board.
In her press release, the county executive called the newer legislation “an ill-conceived attempt to weaken what has been described as one of the strongest ordinances banning pay-to-play in the State of New Jersey.” Among the reasons cited by Donovan for the veto of Freeholder Ordinance 13-06 are the increase in contribution limits and the weakening of penalties for those found in violation of the pay-to-play law.
Because the new ordinance initially passed by a 6-1 vote, the veto could be overridden by the Board in a future vote.
May 2, 2013 •
Pay-to-Play Ordinance Passes in Bergen County, NJ
6-1 Vote
The Bergen County New Jersey Board of Chosen Freeholders passed an ordinance yesterday modifying the county’s pay-to-play laws.
NorthJersey.com reports the Board voted 6-1 in favor of changes to the code that include lowering the debarment period for future county contracts from four years to one year. Contractors will also be able to make political contributions up to $5,200 to county political parties.
The ordinance must next go to County Executive Kathleen Donovan. Executive Donovan vetoed prior pay-to-play measures last year. If the ordinance is not vetoed, or if a veto is overridden, it will become effective 20 days after publication.
Freeholder Maura DeNicola cast the single vote against the ordinance, calling it “an incumbent protection program” according to NorthJersey.com.
April 20, 2013 •
NJ ELEC Makes Recommendations in Annual Report
2012 Annual Report
In the 2012 Annual report issued by the New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission (ELEC) on April 15, the Commission listed several recommendations and ideas to strengthen the state’s campaign finance and lobbying laws.
ELEC recommends requiring disclosure from super PACs and non-profit groups organized under Section 527 and Section 501(c) of the IRS code, requiring disclosure of lobbying activity by local vendors who are required to report pay-to-play contributions, and expanding the 48-hour notice requirement for continuing PAC expenditures to require the filing of notices for expenditures made in May municipal, runoff, school, and special elections.
Among its other recommendations, ELEC calls for the state to expand the regulation of “wheeling” to include contributions by county political party committees to other county political party committees during the entire year.
In the report, the Commission also lists general ideas to strengthen the laws, including requiring grassroots lobbying materials to list the name and address of the committee paying for the material, increasing penalties for public financing violations, and banning the use of partnership funds for the purpose of making contributions.
The annual report can be found here.
State and Federal Communications, Inc. provides research and consulting services for government relations professionals on lobbying laws, procurement lobbying laws, political contribution laws in the United States and Canada. Learn more by visiting stateandfed.com.