Columbus mayoral candidate Andrew Ginther recently proposed a plan for new ethics rules for lobbyists and elected officials. His plan would amend the definition of lobbyist and expand lobbyist reporting requirements. Elected officials would be required to report all gifts received as well as participate in annual ethics training. The plan would also require additional disclosure in city campaign finance filings beyond the requirements already set by state law.

Ginther, president of Columbus City Council, faces Franklin County Sheriff Zach Scott in the November election; Scott also has a plan for tightening restrictions on lobbyists and proposing gift rules.

On November 19, the California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) will consider a proposed regulation concerning the procedures for notification of enforcement complaints. The proposals to be heard at the public hearing will include a revised policy for media and public record inquiries. The FPPC is accepting written comments submitted to the Commission offices no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 17, 2015. The notice for the proposed regulatory changes can be accessed here.

National:

Corporations Improve Reporting of Political Activity – with Exceptions
Center for Public Integrity – Dave Levinthal and Cady Zuvich | Published: 10/8/2015

A new study asserts that most of the nation’s largest corporations are showing “sustained, concrete progress” toward volunteering more information about how they interact with governments, politicians, and campaigns. The study awarded points in 24 categories to companies that, for example, voluntarily disclose contributions to certain nonprofit groups, publish policies that govern political expenditures from its corporate treasury, and reveal money spent to influence state-level ballot initiatives. Such disclosures generally exceed what is required of corporations, such as regularly filing disclosure reports about congressional lobbying activity.

Federal:

Donald Trump’s Candidacy Raises Novel Ethics Questions
USA Today – Fredreka Schouten | Published: 10/6/2015

Experts say federal law would not explicitly prohibit Donald Trump from continuing to run his sprawling gambling, real-estate, and brand-marketing empire if he is elected president. And the conflict-of-interest rules that bar Cabinet secretaries and other high-ranking executive branch officials from overseeing matters that boost their personal bottom lines do not apply to the president. As president, Trump would appoint members to the Federal Reserve Board, which sets interest rates that could affect mortgages on his real estate. His pick for the Interior Department would make decisions affecting Indian tribes with gambling interests that compete with Trump’s casinos. “[Trump] stands out because he’s not just a businessman – he’s the Flo Ziegfeld or the P.T. Barnum of politics. He’s genuinely unique”” said Barbara Perry, director of presidential studies at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center.

Experts: John Kasich political ads chart new territory
USA Today – Fredreka Schouten | Published: 10/7/2015

A television ad promoting Ohio Gov. John Kasich’s presidential campaign opens with images of Islamic State fighters and Russia’s Vladimir Putin, and touts Kasich as the one candidate with the experience to deal with a dangerous world. The video does not come from the Republican’s campaign, however. Instead, it is produced and funded by an outside group that can raise unlimited amounts to back Kasich’s candidacy. And in a test of rules that bar candidates from coordinating with independent groups, Kasich shot footage for this and other ads in concert with the outside group. Kasich’s camp and his allies argue that is permissible because he was not officially a candidate when he taped material for the commercials.

Gallup Gives Up the Horse Race
Politico – Steven Shepard | Published: 10/6/2015

After a bruising 2012 cycle, in which its polls were farther off than most of its competitors, Gallup said it is not planning any polls for the presidential primaries this cycle. And, even following an internal probe into what went wrong last time around, Gallup would not commit to tracking the general election next year. The move comes at a time of unusual tumult in the polling world. Some have expressed concern about the accuracy of polling at a time when fewer people are reachable or willing to talk to pollsters.

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy Drops Out of Race for House Speaker
Washington Post – Mike DeBonis | Published: 10/8/2015

U.S. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy abruptly took himself out of the race to succeed John Boehner as speaker, apparently undone by the same forces that drove Boehner to resign. McCarthy’s candidacy was damaged when he suggested in an interview that the House committee investigating Benghazi had the political aim of damaging Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. He acknowledged his remarks about Benghazi had factored into his decision. McCarthy’s hopes of uniting Republicans took a blow when a close-knit group of roughly 40 hardline conservatives, the House Freedom Caucus, said it would back U.S. Rep. Daniel Webster.

Pithy, Mean and Powerful: How Donald Trump mastered Twitter for 2016
New York Times – Michael Barbaro | Published: 10/5/2015

Donald Trump has mastered Twitter in a way no candidate for president ever has, redefining its power as a tool of political promotion, distraction, and attack – and turning a 140-character task that other candidates farm out to staff members into a centerpiece of his campaign. In the process, he has managed to fulfill a vision sketched out a decade ago by a handful of digital campaign strategists: a White House candidacy that forgoes costly, conventional methods of communication and relies instead on the free and visceral platforms of social media. As Trump enters an uncertain period, even rival campaigns acknowledge Twitter is providing a bulwark against a slide in his poll numbers by allowing millions of supporters to make his case for him and deflect the controversies he touches off.

From the States and Municipalities:

California – More Transparency Coming for Referendums
San Diego Union-Tribune – David Garrick | Published: 10/6/2015

The San Diego City Council approved stricter reporting rules for groups supporting or opposing referendum campaigns. The changes make disclosures regarding referendums and initiatives the same as the city now requires of candidates seeking elective office. The rules will require committees formed to support or oppose an initiative or referendum to file disclosures within 10 days of receiving $100 contributions and within 24 hours of receiving $1,000 contributions. In addition, committees that make independent expenditures to support or oppose an initiative or referendum must file disclosures of all expenditures and funding sources within 24 hours during the signature gathering phase.

Kansas – Lobbyists Spend $500,000 on Food, Drink for Kansas Lawmakers
Wichita Eagle – Bryan Lowry | Published: 10/2/2015

Lobbyists in 2015 spent more than $500,000 entertaining Kansas lawmakers during the longest legislative session in the state’s history. State law prohibits lobbyists from making campaign donations during the session and limits them to spending $100 on gifts for a lawmaker. But unlike some other states, Kansas has no cap on the amount of food and drink a lobbyist can buy a legislator. Data from the state ethics commission give a partial picture of which organizations were most active in lobbying and which lawmakers they focused on during the session. But more than half the spending is not itemized, meaning it is not linked to a specific lawmaker.

Kentucky – Kentucky Lawmakers, Lobbyists May Already Be Violating New State Ethics Laws
Insider Louisville – Jonathan Meador | Published: 10/6/2015

An advisory from the Kentucky Legislative Ethics Commission expressed concern that lawmakers may be directly soliciting campaign contributions from lobbyists, potentially violating new laws specifically prohibiting them from doing so. Commission Executive Director John Schaaf says legislators might be sending fundraising appeals to lobbyists – including dollar amounts required for attendance at fundraisers, and to whom the payment should be made – which may then be passed on to the lobbyists’ employers. This, Schaaf said, likely would constitute a direct solicitation of a contribution.

New Mexico – New Corruption Fine Could Be Applied to Duran Case
Albuquerque Journal – Deborah Baker | Published: 10/5/2015

New Mexico Secretary of State Dianna Duran is facing 65 criminal charges including fraud, embezzlement, and money laundering for allegedly misusing campaign contributions to cover personal spending, including at casinos. Twenty-six of the charges are felonies. Under a 2012 law, if Duran were convicted of a felony, a judge could increase her sentence by imposing a fine “not to exceed the value of the salary and fringe benefits paid to the offender” since the commission of the first felony for which she was convicted. It would be the first time the law has been used against a statewide official, and it is not clear how it would work. It does not use the word “pension,” and it does not technically provide for pension forfeiture. But losing pensions is precisely what legislators had in mind when they passed it.

North Carolina – Advisory Letter Could Permit Bigger Role for Outside Groups in NC Elections
WRAL – Mark Binker | Published: 10/3/2015

An advisory letter from State Board of Elections Director Kim Strach says her agency has no ability to regulate organizations that mail, publish, or broadcast issue ads, which often look like, and for all practical purposes are, campaign ads. Groups that avoid “express advocacy” and do not trip certain thresholds on the election calendar may remain unregulated and are free to exchange certain types of information with candidates. Strach’s letter lays out how policy organizations or groups formed to bolster a particular candidate for governor, such as the Renew North Carolina Foundation that has aired ads featuring Gov. Pat McCrory, may communicate with their favored candidates.

North Carolina – Legislature’s Last-Minute Rush Prompts Criticism
Raleigh News & Observer – Colin Campbell | Published: 10/3/2015

Lack of transparency and time for public input was a common theme in the General Assembly’s final days in Raleigh, with lawmakers using a variety of maneuvers to move proposals that had not previously been made public. Longtime observers of the legislature say unexamined proposals tend to surface in the final days of every session, regardless of which party is in charge. Also drawing criticism was the decision to extend the final session to four a.m., rather than adjourning and finishing the year’s business in daylight hours later. As dawn approached, some lawmakers fell asleep in their seats. Others played music or passed a football to stay awake. And 37 House members and seven Senate members were already gone before the final vote.

Ohio – Redlight Camera Lobbyist Agrees to Plead to Extortion, Releases Statement
Columbus Dispatch – Lucas Sullivan | Published: 10/2/2015

Lobbyist John Raphael agreed to plead guilty extortion for pressuring a traffic-camera company to make more than $70,000 in campaign contributions to officials in Columbus and Cincinnati. He told federal officials he warned Redflex Traffic Systems that it would lose out on contracts with the cities if it did not make the donations. Raphael then made the contributions to the unnamed officials through himself, family members, friends, and business associates. Former Redflex Chief Executive Officer Karen Finley has pleaded guilty to funneling campaign contributions to officials in the two cities between 2005 and 2013. Finley’s plea agreement said contributions intended for Columbus officials were given to the Franklin County Democratic Party and Ohio Democratic Party.

Pennsylvania – House Passes Legislation to Increase Lobbying Fines
Pennsylvania Business Daily; Staff –   | Published: 10/7/2015

The Pennsylvania House passed legislation to increase fines for lobbying violations. House Bill 1348 would increase the maximum penalty from $2,000 to $4,000. It also increases the maximum penalty under current law for negligent failure to report, in varying increments over time. The bill also would require all disclosure filings to be posted on the Department of State’s website within seven days of receipt. It now goes to the state Senate.

Wisconsin – GOP Bills Would Hike Contribution Limits, Split GAB into Two Agencies
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel – Patrick Marley | Published: 10/7/2015

Republican lawmakers formally unveiled a plan to disband the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board (GAB), calling it a well-intentioned experiment that failed. The bill would split the GAB into two separate commissions, one regulating ethics laws and the other covering elections. It would be similar to the system the GAB replaced in 2007. Members would be partisan appointees, evenly split between Republicans and Democrats. GOP lawmakers also introduced a campaign finance bill that would double how much donors can give to candidates. It would also rewrite laws that are out of step with a host of state and federal court rulings that have loosened campaign finance restrictions.

State and Federal Communications produces a weekly summary of national news, offering more than 60 articles per week focused on ethics, lobbying, and campaign finance.

Wisconsin legislators introduced bills Wednesday to double political contribution limits, amend campaign finance rules, and divide the state’s Government Accountability Board. Critics argue the agency split is a bad idea, as it turns over control from nonpartisan judges to partisan appointees.

The specific bill would create two new agencies, the Elections Commission and the Ethics Commission, to oversee laws on ethics, campaign finance, and lobbying. Legislators intend to amend the bill to ensure the six-member commissions are split evenly between Democrats and Republicans.

Both commissions would go into effect June 30, 2016.

Lobby Comply is pleased to announce the celebration of our 4,000^th blog post! We will continue to be the expert source, providing the latest news and analysis on campaign finance, lobbying, procurement, and ethics laws.

Thank you to all of our loyal readers!

County commissioners unanimously approved a motion by Chairwoman Sandy Murman to increase transparency for those who are paid to lobby the Commission. An Office of Professional Lobbyist Registration will be created within the county attorney’s office and the county attorney will draft amendments to the existing ordinance.

Currently, lobbyists must register prior to each meeting with an official, but many do not adhere to this requirement. The new ordinance will require notice of visits by lobbyists to be posted online and the registration office will be responsible for enforcement.

Chairwoman Murman stated she wants the ordinance to focus on paid lobbyists, excluding volunteers from the requirements.

The Pennsylvania House unanimously approved a bill to increase the penalty for violating the Lobbying Disclosure Act. The bill places the maximum penalty at $4,000, up from $2,000, and incrementally increases the penalty for negligent failure to register or report based on the number of days late.

In an attempt to increase transparency, the bill further requires all filings to be posted online within seven days. The bill now goes to the Senate for consideration.

Photo of the Pennsylvania State Capitol by Michael180 on Wikimedia Commons.

The number of municipalities and regional governments our research associates track continues to grow. We now cover almost 300 municipalities and local governments. This is part of a continuous effort to better serve the needs of our clients.

In that effort, we have recently added an abridged jurisdiction to our website. This entry, condensed due to the limited number of relevant local laws, provides the core information our clients need for their government relations work.

The new jurisdiction is: Lynchburg, Virginia.

Seal of the City of Lynchburg courtesy of CityofLynchburg on Wikimedia Commons.

On September 17, 2015, a new lobbying law took effect in San Joaquin County, California. Ordinance 4468, passed by the Board of Supervisors in August, requires lobbyists, lobbying firms, and lobbyist’s employers to register when lobbying county officials. Registration with the clerk of the board is required 10 days after becoming engaged as a lobbyist. There is an initial registration fee of $75. The annual registration renewal fee is $50.

The new county ordinance defines lobbying activities as oral, written, or electronic communication made directly or indirectly to a county official, for the purpose of persuading or influencing official actions or decisions. An individual is required to register when he or she is employed, contracts, or otherwise receives compensation of $500 or more in any calendar month to communicate directly or through agents, employees, or subcontractors with any county official for the purpose of influencing official action. However, a substantial or regular portion of the activities for which the person receives such compensation must be for the purpose of influencing official action. Influencing official action includes promoting, supporting, influencing, modifying, opposing, or delaying actions of any county official, including soliciting county contracts or funds. Influence can include providing county officials with statistics, studies, or analyses.

Registration is not required by agents and employees of tax-exempt organizations, elected and appointed public officials and employees, news organizations, and advocates or attorneys in certain circumstances. Amendments to a registration form must be completed and filed by the lobbyist with the clerk of the board within ten days of any change.

Penalties for failing to register range from a written warning to daily fines staggered in the amounts of $25, $50, and $75, up to a maximum penalty of $500. Penalties also include disqualification from county contracts if any lobbyist, lobbying firm, employer, or other person or entity acting on behalf of the person or entity seeking the contract fails to comply with the county’s lobbying ordinance.

Q. We recently hired a lobbyist that is coming to our company directly from spending a number of years as a Senate staffer.  What restrictions should we be aware of as her new employer in terms of who she can contact on the Hill?

A. Both the House and the Senate have post-employment restrictions for certain individuals leaving their employment on the Hill.  Importantly, the House and Senate ethics committees will discuss with the staffer prior to his or her departure the restrictions under which he or she must operate.  That said, as her new employer you should definitely be aware of what restrictions are applicable to her situation so neither the company nor she violates the rules.

For the Senate, senior staff (currently defined as individuals whose annual salary is $130,500 or more) are subject to a one-year, Senate-wide ban.  Essentially, senior staff leaving the Senate may not lobby the entire Senate for one year following their departure – this includes lobbying contact with personal, committee, and leadership offices.  Staff making less than $130,500 a year are subject to a one year ban from lobbying their particular office – whether personal, committee, or leadership office.

The House restriction for senior staff is a one year ban from lobbying the particular office for which the former staffer worked and there is no ban in the House for staffers making less than $130,500.

You can directly submit questions for this feature, and we will select those most appropriate and answer them here. Send your questions to: experts@stateandfed.com.

(We are always available to answer questions from clients that are specific to your needs, and we encourage you to continue to call or e-mail us with questions about your particular company or organization. As always, we will confidentially and directly provide answers or information you need.) Our replies to your questions are not legal advice. Instead, these replies represent our analysis of laws, rules, and regulations.

On September 30, North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory signed legislation moving next year’s presidential primary and general primary for state elected offices to a single date in March. House Bill 373 sets the single primary date to March 15, 2016. The bill contains other provisions include adjusting the filing dates for campaign finance reporting and permitting the leader of each political party caucus of the House of Representatives and the Senate to establish a separate affiliated party committee to support the election of candidates of that leader’s political party. According to the governor’s press release, he signed the bill after getting an agreement from the legislature to make revisions to the bill regarding campaign finance law, including prohibiting contributions from lobbyists or political action committees while the legislature is in session.

“There were specific concerns I had with the original version of the bill, and the General Assembly agreed to make revisions to address those concerns,” said McCrory in his press release.

Photo of Gov. Pat McCrory by Hal Goodtree on Wikimedia Commons.

On September 30, the North Carolina General Assembly adjourned its legislative session. Both chambers finished their legislative work shortly after 4 a.m. The Legislature is scheduled to next convene on April 25, 2016.

Photo of the North Carolina State Capitol by Jayron32 on Wikimedia Commons.

Alaska Gov. Bill Walker called for a third special legislative session to convene on October 24, 2015.

The Legislature will meet in Juneau to consider an act to monetize certain natural gas reserves via a gas reserves tax, as well as an act to make supplemental, capital, and operating appropriations from the constitutional budget reserve fund.

Prosecutors charged Attorney General Kathleen Kane with an additional perjury charge for lying to a grand jury about an oath of secrecy she took in 2013. Kane was charged in August with conspiracy and official oppression perjury for leaking secret grand jury materials to a Philadelphia newspaper in order to embarrass a political enemy.

Last month, the state’s Supreme Court ordered the temporary suspension of Kane’s law license, possibly leading to efforts to remove her from office. Kane denies any wrongdoing and stated she will not resign.