Mayor Sam Liccardo is proposing new lobbyist disclosure rules for the city of San Jose. The rules would require lobbyists to report lobbyist activity weekly in electronic form. Currently, the city of San Jose requires quarterly disclosures be filed on paper.

The new rules also would require lobbyists to specify how they are contacting city officials – in person, by phone, or by email.

The city council will consider the mayor’s proposals at its next meeting, scheduled for December 15, 2015.

Beginning January 2016, LeeAnn Pelham will be the new executive director of the San Francisco Ethics Commission.

Pelham previously served as the director of the Los Angeles Ethics Commission and is expected to use her prior experience to shape ethics and enforcement policy in the city.

The Orange County Board of Supervisors approved a ballot measure which would create an ethics commission for the county. A newly created ethics commission would oversee the enforcement of the county’s campaign finance ordinance.

Voters will have the opportunity to approve the measure on June 7, 2016, the date of the presidential primary election.

Proposition C, a measure requiring registration fees and monthly reports from expenditure lobbyists, was approved by voters in San Francisco. The measure creates a new category of lobbyists, termed expenditure lobbyists, defined as organizations who employ lobbyists to influence city officials.

The measure imposes a registration threshold of $2,500 or more in a calendar month spent soliciting, requesting, or urging other persons to communicate directly with a city official. Expenditure lobbyists must pay a $500 fee to register with the city.

The measure takes effect February 1, 2016.

On November 19, the California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) will consider a proposed regulation concerning the procedures for notification of enforcement complaints. The proposals to be heard at the public hearing will include a revised policy for media and public record inquiries. The FPPC is accepting written comments submitted to the Commission offices no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 17, 2015. The notice for the proposed regulatory changes can be accessed here.

On September 17, 2015, a new lobbying law took effect in San Joaquin County, California. Ordinance 4468, passed by the Board of Supervisors in August, requires lobbyists, lobbying firms, and lobbyist’s employers to register when lobbying county officials. Registration with the clerk of the board is required 10 days after becoming engaged as a lobbyist. There is an initial registration fee of $75. The annual registration renewal fee is $50.

The new county ordinance defines lobbying activities as oral, written, or electronic communication made directly or indirectly to a county official, for the purpose of persuading or influencing official actions or decisions. An individual is required to register when he or she is employed, contracts, or otherwise receives compensation of $500 or more in any calendar month to communicate directly or through agents, employees, or subcontractors with any county official for the purpose of influencing official action. However, a substantial or regular portion of the activities for which the person receives such compensation must be for the purpose of influencing official action. Influencing official action includes promoting, supporting, influencing, modifying, opposing, or delaying actions of any county official, including soliciting county contracts or funds. Influence can include providing county officials with statistics, studies, or analyses.

Registration is not required by agents and employees of tax-exempt organizations, elected and appointed public officials and employees, news organizations, and advocates or attorneys in certain circumstances. Amendments to a registration form must be completed and filed by the lobbyist with the clerk of the board within ten days of any change.

Penalties for failing to register range from a written warning to daily fines staggered in the amounts of $25, $50, and $75, up to a maximum penalty of $500. Penalties also include disqualification from county contracts if any lobbyist, lobbying firm, employer, or other person or entity acting on behalf of the person or entity seeking the contract fails to comply with the county’s lobbying ordinance.

A proposed constitutional amendment has been submitted to appear on the November 2016 ballot.

This measure, titled The Voters’ Right to Know Act, would increase campaign finance disclosure requirements and eliminate gifts to public officials from certain entities.

The act is designed to remove the “dark money” loopholes of nonprofit contributors by requiring anyone contributing $10,000 or more to be identified if that money winds up supporting a political effort. It also calls for updating and improving the electronic reporting system, clearer disclosure of contributors on television ads, and stronger penalties for violators.

The act also would ban gifts to public officials from lobbyists and lobbyist employers. The monetary limit on gifts to public officials from individuals would be lowered to $200 from the current amount of $460.

Backers of this proposition hope it will lead to greater transparency and encourage greater engagement from all voters.

City Councilman David Ryu is working to keep his campaign promise of shaking up the status quo at city hall.

He has sent a letter to the city Ethics Commission requesting they look into the possibility of banning contributions to candidates by businesses, labor unions, and other groups.

He had planned to introduce legislation to accomplish this change; however, when no other council member would sign onto the legislation, Ryu turned to the Ethics Commission, asking them to explore ways to achieve such a ban.

While reform groups support such a ban, critics of the proposal fear it will lead to legal challenges and drive more money to independent expenditure groups.

On September 15, the San Diego, California City Council voted unanimously to raise the registration fees for lobbyists. The new ordinance, which was approved by the Budget Committee in July, increases the annual registration from $40 to $150. Annual registration fees paid by clients who hire lobbyists also increases from $15 to $30. These increases are the first since the enactment of lobbyist registration fees in 2008. The changes  take effect January 1, 2016.

The Legislature has passed a bill requiring new political advertising standards.

Sponsored by Assemblywoman Susan Bonilla, Assembly Bill 990 will require political advertisements to carry larger statements clearly stating information about who is paying for the advertisement.

Bonilla introduced the legislation to ensure voters will be able to easily identify the sponsors behind any political advertising.

The State Assembly has passed Assembly Bill 10 and sent it to the governor.

This bill contains provisions affecting elected officials’ disclosure of financial investments and conflicts of interest. It requires public officials to provide more detailed information about their business dealings and investments.

It also raises the thresholds used to decide if an official’s investments create a conflict of interest.

AB 10 is linked to Senate Bill 21, which also passed and has been sent to the governor. In order for these bills to become law, both must be signed.

Photo of the California State Capitol by Nikopoley on Wikimedia Commons.

On September 15, the Sacramento, California City Council will vote to determine whether to create an ethics commission with a new ethics code. An office of compliance would also be created for city employee training of local and state ethics laws. Additionally, if the legislation is passed, a redistricting commission would be created to draw new boundaries for City Council districts.

Mayor Kevin Johnson said the proposals are “a breakthrough that provides an unprecedented level of accountability and transparency to Sacramento city government,” according to the Sacramento Bee.

On September 10, a bill requiring disclosure of funding for California government officials’ travel was sent by the Legislature to the Governor. Senate Bill 21 requires a nonprofit organization paying for the actual costs of travel for an elected state officer or local elected officeholder to disclose the names of donors responsible for funding the payments. The legislation also requires a person who receives a gift of a travel payment from any source to report the travel destination on his or her statement of economic interests.

City Clerk Toni Taber was given a reprieve by City Council following a review of the clerk’s job performance during a closed-door meeting on September 1. She had been facing dismissal.

The review was triggered by faulty advice provided by the clerk’s office to City Council and mayoral candidates during the 2014 local elections. The clerk’s office had instructed the candidates to follow state law when reporting late contributions. However, local law has stricter reporting standards.

This lack of information resulted in thousands of dollars in campaign contributions being improperly reported over the past two years and one councilman being fined $10,000 for improper filing.

While Taber was granted a second chance, her office still faces an audit and may have several of its key functions transferred to other city departments.