April 2, 2014 •
US Supreme Court Rules Aggregate Political Contributions are Unconstitutional
Today the United States Supreme Court ruled that aggregate limits on federal campaign contributions are unconstitutional. In a 5-4 decision, with a separate majority opinion by Justice Thomas, the Court found aggregate limits do not further the permissible government interest […]
Today the United States Supreme Court ruled that aggregate limits on federal campaign contributions are unconstitutional.
In a 5-4 decision, with a separate majority opinion by Justice Thomas, the Court found aggregate limits do not further the permissible government interest in preventing quid pro quo corruption or the appearance of such corruption.
The case, McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, sought to allow Shaun McCutcheon to make political contributions to several federal candidates exceeding the two-year aggregate limit set in 2 U.S.C §441a(a)(3)(A). The plaintiff had argued the limit is unconstitutional because it violates a citizen’s right to speak and to associate with not just any candidate, but every candidate of his choosing. The Supreme Court had decided to grant a review of the case in February 2013 and oral arguments were made on October 8, 2013.
Photo of the United State Supreme Court Building courtesy of Mfield on Wikimedia Commons.
February 24, 2014 •
US Supreme Court Ruling on Aggregate Limits of Political Contributions May be Coming Soon
A United States Supreme Court ruling deciding the constitutionally of aggregate limits on federal campaign contributions may be issued as early as this week. The case, McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, seeks to allow Shaun McCutcheon to make political contributions […]
A United States Supreme Court ruling deciding the constitutionally of aggregate limits on federal campaign contributions may be issued as early as this week.
The case, McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, seeks to allow Shaun McCutcheon to make political contributions to several federal candidates exceeding the two-year aggregate limit set in 2 U.S.C §441a(a)(3)(A). The plaintiff argues the limit is unconstitutional because it violates a citizen’s right to speak and to associate with not just any candidate, but every candidate of his choosing.
The Supreme Court decided to grant a review of the case in February 2013 and oral arguments were made on October 8, 2013.
Photo of the United States Supreme Court Building courtesy of UpStateNYer on Wikimedia Commons.
October 17, 2013 •
Thursday News Roundup
Here are some great articles for today’s government relations news summary:
Lobbying
“Uber hires first DC lobbying firm” by Bendon Sasso in The Hill.
Campaign Finance
“McCutcheon and the Future of Campaign Finance Reform” by Rick Cohen in the Nonprofit Quarterly.
“Former FEC Commissioner, Lessig debate campaign finance reform (video)” on Harvard.edu.
California: “Political Parties And A Campaign Finance No-Man’s Land” by Joe Yerardi in KPBS Public Broadcasting.
Michigan: “Campaign Finance Expert Visits Dearborn on Oct. 24” by Daniel Lai in the Dearborn Patch.
Montana: “Commissioner says ongoing investigation finds ‘dark money’ groups coordinated with candidate” by Matt Gouras (Associated Press) in The Republic.
Ethics
“Members of Congress Keep Lawyers Busy” by Kent Cooper in Roll Call’s Political MoneyLine.
Campaigns and Elections
“6 Major Surprises in House Campaign Fundraising” by Emily Cahn in Roll Call.
Illinois: “Gov. Candidates File Campaign Finance Reports” on WICS News.
New Jersey: “Cory Booker Elected Senator in New Jersey” by Kyle Trygstad in Roll Call.
Oklahoma: “Oklahoma congressmen report campaign contributions” by Chris Casteel in The Oklahoman.
Tech and Social Media
“Democracy.com Hopes to Level Campaign Playing Field With Social Network For Politics” by Miranda Neubauer in TechPresident.
“The Demise of the Public Hearing” by Rob Gurwitt in Governing.
State and Federal Communications, Inc. provides research and consulting services for government relations professionals on lobbying laws, procurement lobbying laws, political contribution laws in the United States and Canada. Learn more by visiting stateandfed.com.