March 5, 2020 •
Arkansas Contribution Blackout Unenforceable
An order barring the state from enforcing a campaign contribution blackout period of more than two years was reinstated on March 3. Arkansas Code Annotated 7-6-203(e) prohibits candidates for state offices from accepting campaign contributions more than two years before […]
An order barring the state from enforcing a campaign contribution blackout period of more than two years was reinstated on March 3.
Arkansas Code Annotated 7-6-203(e) prohibits candidates for state offices from accepting campaign contributions more than two years before an election.
In place since 1996, the constitutionality of the law was challenged in June 2019.
The court agreed to stay the injunction, keeping the law in effect while the proceedings continued.
The injunction was affirmed on January 27.
This prompts the plaintiff’s attorney to push for the stay to be lifted, and the law to become unenforceable.
The stay was lifted on March 3, enjoining the state from enforcing the law while the lawsuit is pending.
A date has yet to be determined for a final hearing on the matter.
June 18, 2019 •
Arkansas to Appeal Rejection of Campaign Finance Rule
A federal judge blocked a state law that prevents candidates for public office from accepting campaign contributions more than two years before an election. The ruling prompted an immediate appeal from the attorney general. Plaintiff Peggy Jones of Pulaski County […]
A federal judge blocked a state law that prevents candidates for public office from accepting campaign contributions more than two years before an election.
The ruling prompted an immediate appeal from the attorney general.
Plaintiff Peggy Jones of Pulaski County filed suit on April 5 over Arkansas Code 7-6-203(e).
Jones claimed the blackout period infringed on her First Amendment right of political expression by preventing her from donating money now to those she wishes to support as candidates in the 2022 election cycle.
Jones contended the blackout period is unconstitutional because it is not closely drawn to address the important governmental interest of preventing corruption.
She also claimed the law is over-broad because it bars all campaign contributions, including small contributions that do not present a potential for corruption.
U.S. District Judge James Moody Jr. granted a preliminary injunction on June 17, enjoining the state from enforcing the law during the pendency of the matter.
State and Federal Communications, Inc. provides research and consulting services for government relations professionals on lobbying laws, procurement lobbying laws, political contribution laws in the United States and Canada. Learn more by visiting stateandfed.com.