Super Tuesday in 2016
I always felt Super
Tuesday needed a mascot. And, that
is my first point of clarification.
I am talking about the primary
election day…nothing to do with the
ESPN television series.
We
first heard the term in 1984 when
Walter Mondale and Gary Hart vied
for the nomination. In fact, we had
three of them that year. I won’t go
into the detail about what each
candidate said. Sufficient to say in
the end, Walter Mondale only won the
electoral votes that November in
Minnesota and in DC. [Please note
Wikipedia states the term was really
used in 1976.]
So what is it? Super
Tuesday refers to the day in a
presidential election year when the
greatest number of states hold
primary elections to select
delegates to the national
conventions.
-
1984—five states
were involved which helped bring
the nomination to Democrat
Walter Mondale;
-
1988 - nine
states held primary elections on
March 8, 1988 and the votes were
split between Democrats Dick
Gephardt, Jesse Jackson, Al
Gore, and Michael Dukakis with
the latter eventually being
nominated;
-
1992 - The March
10, 1992 election brought
Democrat Bill Clinton into the
national spotlight;
-
1996 - March 12,
1996 included nine states and
secured Republican Bob Dole’s
bid;
-
2000 - 16 states
participated in the March 7,
2000 election;
-
2004 - Fewer
states participated on February
3, 2004, and there were only
five states with primaries and
two caucuses;
-
2008 - Only four
states held primary elections on
March 4, 2008, but 24 had moved
their own primary election up to
February 5, 2008 so it ended up
being called Super Duper
Tuesday;
-
2012 - 10 states
held primary elections on March
6, 2012; and
-
2016 - We will
have 13 states involved in the
March 1, 2016 date.
This column is not
going to support any candidates.
However, it is going to emphasize
the importance of voting whenever
your state has scheduled those
dates. All those election dates are
on our website,
www.stateandfed.com.
On Tuesday, March 15
the staff of State and Federal
Communications are offered one hour
at the beginning of the day to vote
before arriving to work. Until next
month, remember to VOTE, plan for it
so you do not forget or end up out
of town, and encourage friends and
family to do so.
Thank you.
Elizabeth Z. Bartz
President and CEO @elizabethbartz |
|
|
 
California Increases Lobbying
Disclosure Requirements for “Other Payments”
Michael Beckett, Esq., Research
Manager
The Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) has
approved new disclosure requirements for lobbying activities made to
influence legislative or administrative action. The FPPC voted
unanimously to amend regulation 2 C.C.R. §18616 to require
additional information regarding the category of spending known as
“other payments to influence.” The amendment is effective March 5,
2016, but contains language delaying the major disclosure provisions
until after the current reporting period ending in March.
Beginning July 1, 2016, trade groups, unions,
corporations, and other lobbyist employers are required to itemize
other payments to influence of $2,500 or more on a separate form
provided by the commission. The disclosure form must include:
-
The name and business address of the payee;
-
The total payments made during the reporting
period;
-
The cumulative amount paid during the calendar
year; and
-
One of the following codes to describe the
primary purpose of the payment:
-
[S] for non-lobbyist salary and
compensation;
-
[E] for expenses paid directly by the
filer and used by a lobbyist;
-
[L] for legislative-related research
services;
-
[C] for consultants and government
relations;
-
[P] for public affairs and grassroots
campaigns;
-
[A] for advertising;
-
[R] for research and public opinion
research;
-
[LE] for lobbying events to influence
legislative or administrative action; and
-
[O] for all other payments not covered
by one of the listed categories.
The additional disclosure requirements are aimed at
the loophole in the current reporting requirements allowing spending
as diverse as office rent, the hiring of consultants, and a
grassroots advocacy campaign to be reported in a lump sum. The FPPC
released data showing 69 percent of all lobbying reported in 2014
was reported as “other payments,” up from 52 percent in 2010. With
groups reporting greater percentages of expenditures in this
category, the FPPC concluded the public was increasingly denied the
ability to monitor activities closely related to lobbying. |

Summary of Changes UPDATE
Note Recent Changes to
Compliance Regulations
Michael Beckett, Esq., Research
Manager
FEDERAL: On January 19, the U.S.
Supreme Court denied an appeal arguing against a law banning
political contributions to candidates from federal contractors. Last
year, in Miller v. Federal Election Commission, formerly
Wagner v. Federal Election Commission, the U.S. District Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia unanimously upheld the
constitutionality of the law barring contractors from contributing
to candidates, parties, and candidates' and parties’ committees.
Plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of 52 U.S.C. §
30119(a)(1), which prohibits any vendors with contracts with the
federal government from making political contributions to federal
candidates or political parties. Plaintiffs requested the court
declare the law unconstitutional as applied to individuals who have
personal services contracts with federal agencies.
GEORGIA: The Campaign Finance
Commission has approved an increase in the maximum contribution
limits for 2016. The Campaign Finance Act authorizes the commission
to raise or lower the maximum contribution limits by $100 increments
based on inflation or deflation as determined by the consumer price
index published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United
States Department of Labor. Candidates for statewide elected office
may now accept $6,600 for each primary or general election. All
other elected office candidates may accept $2,600 per primary or
general election. Primary and general runoff elections carry a
separate limit of $3,900 for statewide candidates and $1,400 for all
other candidates.
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA:
County commissioners approved an ordinance requiring lobbyists to
register and pay a yearly $50 fee. Under the previous law, lobbyists
simply had to sign a registry each time they appeared to lobby. The
new law requires lobbyists to declare who they represent, what
topics they will be discussing, and with whom they are meeting. The
ordinance also increases the fines for violations and increases the
time lobbying privileges are suspended for repeat offenders. The
definition of lobbying is also expanded to include indirect
communication through emails or text messages.
NEW YORK: The Joint Commission
on Public Ethics (JCOPE) has released an advisory opinion regarding
what constitutes lobbying activity as it pertains to political
consultants and grassroots communications. Advisory Opinion 16-01
requires public relations consultants to register as lobbyists for
grassroots campaigns or if
making contact with a public official, including preliminary
communications to facilitate or enable the eventual substantive
advocacy.
MONTANA: New state campaign
finance rules requiring increased disclosure and electronic filing
for candidates and committees were officially published and became
effective. Reports will be made immediately available to the public
online. A $10 increase in contribution limits for certain candidates
has been announced pursuant to state statute allowing adjustment of
limitations to reflect the consumer price index. Contribution limits
have been raised to $660 for candidates of governor and lieutenant
governor, and to $330 for candidates of other statewide offices.
Limits remain at $170 for all other public offices, including state
Senate and state House. Montana’s contribution limits continue to be
contested in Lair v. Bullock, which argues the state’s
political contribution limits are unconstitutionally low.
|

Legislation We Are
Tracking
At any given time, more than 1,000
legislative bills, which can affect how you do business as a government
affairs professional, are being discussed in federal, state, and local
jurisdictions. These bills are summarized in State and Federal
Communications' digital encyclopedias for lobbying laws, political
contributions, and procurement lobbying and can be found in the client
portion of our website.
Summaries of major bills are also included
in monthly email updates sent to all clients. The chart below shows the
number of bills we are tracking in regard to lobbying laws, political
contributions, and procurement lobbying.
|
Total bills |
Number of Jurisdictions |
Passed |
Died |
Carried over to 2016 |
Lobbying Laws |
209 |
32 |
1 |
6 |
131 |
Political Contributions |
314 |
36 |
2 |
8 |
229 |
Procurement Lobbying |
107 |
26 |
0 |
1 |
86 |
|

Jurisdiction Added to our
Website
The number
of municipalities and regional governments our research
associates track continues to grow. We now cover almost
300 municipalities and local governments.
This is part of a continuous effort to better serve the
needs of our clients.
In that
effort, we have added abridged jurisdictions to
our website. These entries, condensed due to the limited
number of relevant local laws, provide the core
information our clients need for their government
relations work.
The new jurisdiction is:
Asheville, North Carolina |

 |
W E B S I T E
T I P
Every month subscribers to the State and Federal
Communications website receive the Summary of Changes,
which is a list of all of the changes and additions made
to the website in the course of the prior month. In all
publications, a year’s worth of Summary of Changes can
be accessed by clicking on the "Summary of Changes" link
on the left-hand side of the entry’s website page. Below
the link is a convenient chart entitled “Year End
Summary,” which reviews the highlights and major changes
of 2015. |
|
|

ASK THE
EXPERTS
State and
Federal Communications’ Experts Answer Your Questions
Here
is your chance to “Ask the Experts” at State and Federal
Communications, Inc. Send your questions to
experts@stateandfed.com.
(Of course, we have always been available to answer
questions from clients that are specific to your needs, and
we encourage you to continue to call or email us with
questions about your particular company or organization. As
always, we will confidentially and directly provide answers
or information you need.) Our replies are not legal advice,
just our analysis of laws, rules, and regulations.
 |
For a number of years, our association
has hired outside lobbying firms to lobby on our
behalf. I was under the impression that because they
registered and reported their lobbying activities for us,
we didn’t need to register. Based on a recent
conversation, I understand this may not be the case and
we may need to register the association itself as a
federal registrant. Can you tell me the guidelines in
this regard? |
|
 |
Thanks
for your question. This is a consideration that can
often be overlooked when determining the need to
register at the federal level. There is no specific
exception outlined in the registration requirements that
would negate an organization from having to register if
it hires outside consultants that registers and
reports their activity on behalf of their client.
Essentially, if your organization meets the three
registration thresholds, you need to register without
regard for whether your outside consultants are also
registered. The three criteria are:
-
An
organization must have at least one employee who
spends 20 percent or more of his or her time engaged in
lobbying activities. This includes time working and
coordinating with your consultant about your
lobbying initiatives and also includes background
work done in association with a lobbying effort;
-
That
same employee must have two or more lobbying
contacts. There is no time frame in which the two
contacts have to occur. The two contacts could be a
year apart from each other but once the second
contact has been made, this threshold has been
satisfied; and
-
An
organization must spend $12,500 or more on lobbying
activity during a three month period. Expenditures
include payments made to outside consultants and
membership organizations that are allocated toward
lobbying efforts. In addition, compensation,
expenses, and overhead associated with any and all
lobbying activity that is occurring within the
organization must be calculated for purposes of
determining if this threshold has been met.
If your
association meets these three requirements, you need
to register and begin reporting your internal activities
on a quarterly basis. Your outside consultants will
also continue to report the activity in which they
engage on your behalf.
Rebecca
Pixton South,
Federal Compliance Associate |
|

|
 |

State and Federal
Communications, Inc.
Celebrates Staff Anniversaries


Plan to say hello at future
events where State and Federal
Communications, Inc. will be attending and/or
speaking regarding compliance issues. |
Events
March 2
March 7-10 |
Ohio Birthday Party, Washington, DC
PAC
National Conference, Miami Beach, Florida
WGR Toastmasters, Washington, DC
NCSL Foundation Luncheon,
Washington, DC
Women's Endowment Fund, Akron, OH
PLEN Mentor Awards, Washington, DC
Akron Roundtable, Akron, OH
NASPO: How to Market to State
Governments Meeting, Atlanta, GA
WGR Toastmasters, Washington, DC
ACES National Conference,
Portland, OR
Akron Press Club, Akron, OH |
|
COMPLIANCE
NOW is published for our customers and friends.
Click here
to
SUBSCRIBE
or
click
here to UNSUBSCRIBE.
Click here to send us comments regarding
the COMPLIANCE NOW e-newsletter.
State and
Federal Communications, Inc. | Courtyard Square | 80 South
Summit St., Suite 100 | Akron, OH 44308 | | 330-761-9960 |
330-761-9965-fax | 888-4-LAW-NOW|
http://www.stateandfed.com/

 |
The Mission of State
and Federal Communications is to make sure that your
organization can say, "I Comply."
We are the leading
authority and exclusive information source on
legislation and regulations surrounding campaign finance
and political contributions; state, federal, and
municipal lobbying; and procurement lobbying.
Contact us to learn how
conveniently our services will allow you to say "I
Comply" for your compliance activities.
http://www.stateandfed.com
|
www.stateandfed.com |