View Full Print-Friendly Version
![]() |
||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michigan Campaign Finance Bill Becomes Effective by Geoff Wills, Esq. Research Associate On January 6, 2016, Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder signed a campaign finance bill despite a lack of clarification from the Legislature on key provisions. Senate Bill 571 was originally a 12-page bill allowing corporations to collect campaign contributions from employees without annual consent and to place campaign contributions in a general fund before transferring to a separate segregated fund. However, a late night substitution on the last active session day of 2015 added over 40 pages to the bill. Prior to the enactment of the bill, corporations had to annually obtain consent from employees for payroll deduction contributions. The bill eliminates the need for annual consent, replacing it with a one-time opt-in requirement. This change more closely aligns with federal law and eliminates the burden felt by out-of-state corporate political action committees (PACs), which previously found it easier to set up separate Michigan PACs. If federal corporate PACs solicit beyond shareholders, employees, and their spouses, it may still be easier to establish an in-state PAC. Out-of-state corporate PACs must still meet state registration and reporting requirements. The most controversial addition from the late night session is a prohibition on local governments using public funds to communicate regarding ballot proposals by radio, television, mass mailing, or prerecorded telephone message during the 60 days before an election. Local officials urged Snyder to veto the bill and have equated the ban to a gag order. Within two weeks of the passage of Senate Bill 571, two bills were introduced to limit (House Bill 5219) or completely remove (Senate Bill 703) the 60-day prohibition. In addition to the aforementioned changes, the bill also eliminates February quarterly reporting for all PACs. Senate Bill 571 took immediate effect upon the governor’s signature. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael Beckett, Esq., Research Manager CANADA: The commissioner of lobbying, Karen Shepherd, has published general guidance documents to inform lobbyists of the requirements associated with the updated Lobbyists’ Code of Conduct, which became effective December 1, 2015. The new guidance addresses conflict of interest (Rule 6), preferential access (Rules 7 and 8), political activities (Rule 9), and gifts (Rule 10). Generally, the standard for determining whether a lobbyist has created a conflict of interest is “Would an informed person, viewing the matter realistically and practically and having thought the matter through, think that an action taken by a lobbyist has created a sense of obligation on the part of the public officeholder, or a tension between the public officeholder’s private interests and the duty of the public officeholder to serve the public interest?” BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA: The Board of Commissioners voted to loosen strict gift limits imposed by the county Ethics Ordinance. Enacted in 2010, the ordinance created a no-gift rule, prohibiting city and county officials from accepting even a bottle of water at an event. The new rules allow gifts, including nonalcoholic beverages, worth less than $5 and create an exception for gifts of sympathy. Other changes include the burden of reporting lobbying contact shifting away from the public official to the lobbyist and immediate family members may now act as government vendors. MONTANA: On January 9, 2016, a $10 increase in contribution limits for certain candidates became effective. Pursuant to state statute, the Office of the Commissioner of Political Practices, adjusting contribution limitations to reflect the consumer price index, has raised the contribution limit for candidates for the governor and lieutenant governor from $650 to $660. Candidates for statewide office may now accept $330, up from $320. The contribution limit of $170 remains the same for all other public offices, including state Senate and state House. Montana’s contribution limits continue to be contested in the court challenge of Lair v. Bullock, which argues the state’s political contribution limits are unconstitutionally low. NEVADA: Pursuant to the passage of Assembly Bill 273, former legislators must not receive compensation to act as a lobbyist for the period beginning on the date on which the former legislator leaves office as a member of the legislator and ending on the date of final adjournment of the next regular session during which the former Legislator is not a member of the Legislature. This prohibition applies only to a person who is elected or appointed to office as a state legislator on or after November 8, 2016. RHODE ISLAND: Pursuant the passage of House Bill 5920 and Senate Bill 681, a treasurer of a political action committee (PAC) must certify to the substantial accuracy of the campaign finance report at the time of filing. All campaign funds received and expended by a PAC must be segregated from all other accounts. A PAC must maintain a separate campaign account without any noncampaign funds at a financial institution having a physical branch within the state of Rhode Island. The comingling of a personal or business funds with campaign funds is expressly prohibited. A PAC must file a copy of the next bank statement from its campaign account issued after the PAC files its final on-going quarterly campaign finance report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Legislation We Are Tracking At any given time, more than 1,000 legislative bills, which can affect how you do business as a government affairs professional, are being discussed in federal, state, and local jurisdictions. These bills are summarized in State and Federal Communications' digital encyclopedias for lobbying laws, political contributions, and procurement lobbying and can be found in the client portion of our website. Summaries of major bills are also included in monthly email updates sent to all clients. The chart below shows the number of bills we are tracking in regard to lobbying laws, political contributions, and procurement lobbying.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jurisdictions Added to our Website The number of municipalities and regional governments our research associates track continues to grow. We now cover almost 300 municipalities and local governments. This is part of a continuous effort to better serve the needs of our clients. In that effort, we have recently added abridged jurisdictions to our website. These entries, condensed due to the limited number of relevant local laws, provide the core information our clients need for their government relations work. The new jurisdictions are:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASK THE EXPERTS
State and
Federal Communications’ Experts Answer Your Questions
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plan to say hello at future
events where State and Federal
Communications, Inc. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMPLIANCE
NOW is published for our customers and friends. State and
Federal Communications, Inc. | Courtyard Square | 80 South
Summit St., Suite 100 | Akron, OH 44308 |
|