LobbyComply Blog

The Hawaii Legislature has fundamentally changed the landscape for government contractors by enacting House Bill 412. Effective January 1, 2027, this law expands the definition of “lobbying” to include certain procurement activities. If your organization pursues state contracts, these changes may require you to register as a lobbyist even if you have never considered your activities to be traditional lobbying.

Understanding the New Definition of Lobbying

Previously, Hawaii law defined lobbying primarily as communicating with officials to influence legislative or executive action or ballot issues. Under the new provisions of HB 412, lobbying now includes:

• Financial Disclosure Personnel: Communications with any person required to file financial disclosure statements with the state regarding the following procurement matters.
  • Contract Solicitation and Awards: Any communication regarding the solicitation or award of a contract by proposal before an administrative agency.
  • Vendor Relationships: Discussions concerning potential future vendor relationships with an administrative agency.

It is important to note that the law specifically excludes communications that are initiated by a legislator or a state employee.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

The state has introduced significant penalties to ensure adherence to these transparency requirements. Any contract or action entered into by the state that is found to be in violation of lobbying laws may be voidable within 60 days after a violation is determined. The Attorney General, in coordination with the affected purchasing agency, holds the authority to enforce these penalties.

Determining If You Must Register

Not every vendor interaction will trigger a registration requirement. Registration is typically based on specific thresholds, including:

• The amount of compensation received for lobbying activities.
• The total time spent lobbying during a specific reporting period or calendar year.
• The total expenditures made toward lobbying efforts.

Frequently Asked Questions

When do these procurement lobbying changes actually take effect? While the bill was enacted on May 16, 2025, the expanded definition, specifically targeting procurement and vendor relationships, does not take effect until January 1, 2027. This provides organizations a window to assess their current business development strategies and internal compliance protocols.

Does this mean every sales meeting with a state agency is now “lobbying”? Not necessarily. The law focuses on communications concerning the “solicitation or award of a contract by proposal” or “potential future vendor relationships”. Standard administrative inquiries or communications initiated by the state employee are generally excluded. However, because the line between “sales” and “influence” is now thinner, a formal assessment of your activities is highly recommended.

How can I stay updated on these and other state compliance changes? Rules regarding procurement and lobbying are subject to frequent shifts. For in-house teams who need a reliable reference, our Guidebooks provide up-to-date regional data and statutory summaries. If your organization requires a more tailored approach to navigate these new Hawaii requirements, our Consulting team offers hands-on assistance to ensure your procurement efforts remain compliant and your contracts secure.

Utah’s legislative session adjourned sine die on March 6 after 45 days in session. Lawmakers passed Senate Bill 145, which changes definitions related to lobbying and will remove procurement activities from registration requirements for educational and local lobbying. The bill raises limits on expenditures by lobbyists for public officials from $10 to $25 for nonfood expenditures, and to $50 for publications and commemorative items. The bill also creates exceptions to the definition of expenditure in relation to certain sporting events, performances, or exhibitions of a state institution of higher education or a private, nonprofit institution of higher education. The ban on contingency fees for legislative or executive lobbying is expanded to include all forms of lobbying. If signed by the governor, the bill will take effect May 6.

---

Never miss a lobbying compliance deadline. Sign up for our online guidebooks today!

Q: My company is a government contractor. What do I need to know about pay-to-play laws?

A: “Pay-to-play” laws are a set of laws that can restrict contributions from, or require disclosures of contributions made by, current and prospective government contractors. The purpose of such laws is to remove the appearance of quid pro quo between contractors and government officials.

The most common type of pay-to-play laws are those restricting contributions. Such laws will typically ban current and prospective contractors from making political contributions during a period which begins with the government putting the contract out for bid and ending when a bidder either fails to be awarded the contract, for a set time after the contract is awarded to the successful bidder, or when the contract ends. The ban on contributions may apply to the contractor and to employees and political action committees associated with the contractor. 

Some jurisdictions also require the extra step of submitting a certification or a disclosure during the bidding process. Contractors or prospective contractors may be required to certify they have not made contributions in violation of the pay-to-play restrictions prior to the bid award. Disclosures of contributions made may also be required. Updates of these certifications or disclosures may be required on a set schedule based on when the bid was awarded.

The restrictions and disclosures may apply to all contractors or they may be specific to certain industries. For example, Georgia’s law includes provisions specific to electric membership corporations, while Indiana’s law only applies to those who contract with the State Lottery Commission. 

Maryland, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania require disclosure of contributions made by state contractors or their employees on set dates, regardless of when the contracts were awarded. Each state is unique in what contractors are required to disclose, but for each state it is important to know which contracts trigger the disclosure requirements, what the reporting threshold is, and what contributions need to be disclosed. Reportable contributions can include those made by the corporation itself, by political action committees associated with the corporation, by executives and directors of the corporation, or by employees. Maryland’s pay-to-play law is unique in that it requires a registration to be filed as well as a disclosure. It also extends the list of who must file reports to include corporations with registered lobbyists in the state, regardless of the contracting status of the entity. 

Penalties for violations of the pay-to-play laws can be severe. Fines for missed reports may be imposed. More importantly, contracts can be voided at the discretion of the government, and a ban on future contracting may follow. You can learn more about these pay-to-play provisions and avoid the many pitfalls by consulting State & Federal Communication’s Procurement Lobbying Compliance Guidebook.

Frequently Asked Questions About Pay-to-Play Laws for Government Contractors

---

What are pay-to-play laws for government contractors?

Pay-to-play laws are federal, state, and local regulations that restrict or regulate political contributions made by companies seeking or holding government contracts. These laws are designed to prevent the appearance of a quid pro quo relationship between contractors and public officials responsible for awarding contracts.

Depending on the jurisdiction, pay-to-play requirements may include contribution bans, disclosure obligations, bid certifications, or post-award reporting. Because these rules vary significantly by state and sometimes by agency or industry, contractors must evaluate compliance obligations on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis.

---

Do pay-to-play laws apply only to the company, or also to executives and employees?

In many jurisdictions, pay-to-play laws extend beyond the corporate entity itself. Coverage may include executives, directors, board members, certain employees, political action committees affiliated with the company, and in some cases subsidiaries or related entities.

This broad scope means individual political contributions can trigger corporate consequences. For that reason, contractors must understand how “covered individuals” are defined in each jurisdiction and how those definitions affect disclosure or contribution restrictions tied to public contracts.

---

When do pay-to-play restrictions begin and end?

The timing of pay-to-play restrictions varies by state and locality. In some jurisdictions, restrictions begin when a request for proposal is issued or when negotiations for a public contract start. Other laws trigger compliance obligations upon bid submission or contract award.

Restrictions may continue through the evaluation process and extend into a defined post-award period. Because timing provisions differ significantly, contractors should carefully assess when restrictions apply in each jurisdiction where they pursue public business.

---

What happens if a contractor violates pay-to-play laws?

Consequences for violations can be substantial. Depending on the jurisdiction, penalties may include monetary fines, late reporting penalties, voided contracts, disqualification from a pending procurement, or temporary or permanent bans on future contracting.

In some cases, awarding authorities retain discretion to cancel contracts if a violation is discovered after award. Beyond financial and legal exposure, enforcement actions can create reputational risk that affects future government opportunities. Given the potential impact, proactive compliance oversight is critical.

---

Are pay-to-play laws the same in every state?

No. There is no uniform national pay-to-play framework. Each state designs its own regulatory structure, enforcement mechanisms, reporting thresholds, and definitions of covered individuals.

Some states require ongoing disclosure of contributions by contractors regardless of when a contract was awarded. Others impose industry-specific restrictions or apply additional rules to entities with registered lobbyists. This fragmented regulatory environment makes multi-state compliance particularly complex for contractors operating across jurisdictions.

---

What types of contracts trigger pay-to-play requirements?

Triggering contracts vary by jurisdiction. Some states apply pay-to-play rules broadly to most state-level contracts above a specified monetary threshold. Others limit coverage to contracts with particular agencies or within designated industries.

Certain laws may apply only to executive branch contracts, while others extend to local government entities or public authorities. Understanding which contracts activate disclosure or contribution restrictions is an essential first step in evaluating compliance exposure.

---

How can government contractors stay compliant with pay-to-play requirements?

Effective compliance typically involves understanding jurisdiction-specific rules, identifying covered individuals, monitoring political contribution activity, and ensuring required disclosures and certifications are submitted accurately and on time.

Because pay-to-play laws change frequently and vary significantly between states, contractors often rely on regulatory monitoring, compliance resources, and advisory support to stay informed of evolving requirements. A structured compliance approach helps reduce risk while preserving eligibility for public contracting opportunities.

---

How often do pay-to-play laws change?

State and local jurisdictions regularly amend campaign finance and procurement-related statutes, including pay-to-play provisions. Changes may affect contribution thresholds, reporting deadlines, covered officials, or certification requirements.

In addition, enforcement interpretations and agency guidance can evolve over time. For contractors engaged in ongoing public business, continuous monitoring of regulatory developments is essential to maintaining compliance.

---

Is pay-to-play compliance the same as procurement lobbying?

While related, pay-to-play compliance and procurement lobbying compliance are distinct regulatory areas. Pay-to-play laws generally focus on political contributions tied to public contracting, whereas procurement lobbying laws regulate registration and reporting obligations related to sales-oriented communications with public officials.

However, Maryland expanded pay-to-play reporting to include entities with registered lobbyists, creating overlap between the two areas. Contractors should evaluate both regulatory frameworks when assessing overall government relations compliance risk.

Question

I recently began a new position with responsibility for local government relations for my employer. I’ve only previously done state work. What do I need to know?

Answer

Local government lobbying compliance is significantly more fragmented and complex than state-level lobbying, and the differences can catch even experienced state lobbyists off guard. While state lobbying laws tend to follow more standardized frameworks, local lobbying requirements vary widely by jurisdiction, population size, government entity, and even industry.

Local Lobbying Laws Are Not Universal

Unlike state lobbying, some smaller cities, towns, and special districts have no lobbying ordinances. However, the absence of a local ordinance does not necessarily mean that compliance obligations do not exist. In several states, including Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Mississippi, and Missouri, state lobbying laws extend to local government activity, requiring lobbyists to register and report with the applicable state agency when engaging with local officials.

In New York, for example, the state lobbying statute requires disclosure of all lobbying activities before municipalities, including jurisdictional subdivisions with populations exceeding 5,000 residents.

How State Law Can Shape Local Lobbying Requirements

State law may also mandate that local governments adopt their own lobbying frameworks. Maryland does not require local lobbyists to register at the state level, but it requires counties and municipal corporations to maintain lobbying regulations that substantially mirror state lobbying rules.

Highly regulated states such as California often have robust local disclosure requirements, particularly in larger cities and counties. Florida, while somewhat less centralized than California, is also known for numerous local lobbying ordinances that govern municipal and county-level advocacy.

Industry-Specific and Entity-Specific Compliance Risks

Local lobbying requirements frequently extend beyond traditional city councils and county commissions. Special-purpose entities (SPE) often impose their own disclosure regimes. Transportation authorities, such as the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, and airport authorities, such as the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, may require separate registration and reporting.

School districts also present compliance risks. Lobbying activity involving districts such as Broward County Public Schools, Los Angeles Unified School District, or Miami-Dade County Public Schools can trigger registration and periodic reporting obligations, even when activity would not be reportable at the state level.

Healthcare is another highly regulated area. Some public hospital systems impose lobbying requirements that are more stringent than local ordinances. For example, Jackson Health System, an affiliated network of hospitals in Miami-Dade County, requires all pharmaceutical representatives to register as lobbyists before visiting facilities to promote products.

No Thresholds Mean Higher Compliance Exposure

A critical difference between state and local lobbying is that many local jurisdictions impose no monetary or activity thresholds. This means registration may be required simply for engaging in conduct that meets the definition of lobbying, regardless of time spent or compensation received. As a result, even minimal outreach can create compliance obligations.

Before engaging in any local government relations activity, it is essential to independently verify applicable state laws, local ordinances, and entity-specific rules or consult with a lobbying compliance professional to reduce the risk of inadvertent noncompliance.

Note: The information in this response can be easily found on our website in the Lobbying Compliance section of the United States Lobbying Compliance Guidebook.  Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have questions.

Frequently Asked Questions About Local Lobbying Compliance

1. How can I tell whether a local jurisdiction has a lobbying ordinance?

There is no single database or universal indicator. Larger cities and counties are more likely to have lobbying ordinances, but population alone is not determinative. Each jurisdiction must be reviewed individually, including municipal codes, ethics ordinances, and administrative policies. Special districts and quasi-governmental entities should be evaluated separately.

2. Does lobbying a local official always require registration?

Not always, but many local jurisdictions define lobbying broadly. In some cases, registration is required immediately upon engaging in covered activity, regardless of compensation or frequency. Where no registration threshold exists, even introductory meetings, informational outreach, or industry-specific advocacy may trigger obligations.

3. If state law governs local lobbying, do local rules still matter?

Yes. Even when state law applies, local ordinances or entity-specific policies may impose additional requirements. These can include separate registration, local reporting schedules, gift restrictions, or cooling-off periods. State compliance should never be assumed to fully satisfy local obligations.

4. Why is the absence of a registration threshold risky?

When no threshold exists, there is little margin for error. Limited or informal activity can still require registration and reporting, increasing exposure to enforcement actions, fines, or reputational harm if obligations are overlooked. Conservative compliance analysis is strongly recommended.

5. What steps should I take before engaging in local lobbying activity?

Before engaging with local officials or entities, confirm:

• Consult with a Lobbying Compliance Firm
• Whether state law applies to your activity
• Whether the local jurisdiction has a lobbying ordinance
• Whether special entities (school districts, transit authorities, hospitals) impose independent requirements
• Whether industry-specific rules apply

When uncertainty exists, consulting with a lobbying compliance firm, like State and Federal Communications, can help ensure accurate registration, timely reporting, and reduced compliance risk.

Seattle City Council recently passed an ordinance which requires political consultants to register with the Seattle Ethics and Elections Commission within 15 days of providing political consulting services. Political consultants will also be required to disclose information including which local candidates, campaigns, and city ballot measures they work with and when that work began. Initially the bill was intended to prohibit political consultants from simultaneously holding city contracts while doing outside campaign work and also provided for a one-year cooling-off period before consultants could return to work for the city after campaign activities. However, those prohibitions were removed, and the bill instead focuses on consultant registration and reporting. Council Bill 121130 will become effective 30 days after the mayor’s approval.

Question: Do my salespeople need to be registered as lobbyists if they sell to the government?

Answer: More than half of the states consider at least some forms of selling to the government to be lobbying, so caution is definitely warranted. The states that require registration for procurement lobbying all have different approaches, so there is no one-size-fits-all response to this question.

The most important question is what engagements are considered to be procurement lobbying. Some states broadly consider any attempt to influence a contracting decision to be lobbying, and other states use an “outside of the normal procurement process” standard, meaning that registration is required for attempts to change the rules applicable to procurements, to change the substance of the RFP’s requirements, to go outside of established procedures, or to sell to high-ranking officials rather than the end users. Other states, such as Texas, require registration for procurement lobbying, but only when the contract reaches a certain value.

Once you determine your sales activities fall under the definition of lobbying, all the other concerns applicable to lobbyists apply, so your analysis is not complete. Registration thresholds and exceptions for expert testimony, for example, still need to be considered, so, if desired, you may be able to avoid registration through careful consideration of the type and extent your staff’s interactions with government.

One last key factor to consider before registering your staff is contingency fee bans, also known as success fee bans, and how they affect sales staff compensation. While many states acknowledge salespersons frequently receive sales commissions and carve out an exception for commissions paid to “bona fide” salespeople, many others view their contingency bans as applying to all lobbyists, which would prevent your staff from receiving such payments. It is always advisable to determine how you will handle staff compensation before making contacts with the government, as there will be times when it is best to avoid having your staff engage at all.

Further information about the lobbying laws in hundreds of cities, counties, and local agencies can be found in the Procurement Lobbying Compliance Laws section of the State and Federal Communications online guidebooks. Schedule your demo today – https://stateandfed.com/demo/

Q.  We have submitted a bid proposal for a contract with a state agency in Illinois. We were instructed that we must register with the Illinois State Board of Elections. Is this registration different than our existing lobbyist registration? If so, what does that mean for our company?

A. The simple answer is yes. The Illinois Procurement Code requires business entities, whose business or potential business exceeds an aggregate annual total of more than $50,000, to register with the Board of Elections and comply with the state’s Election Code. This registration must be completed prior to submitting any bid that would cause the business entity to exceed the threshold.
In addition to the business entity’s name and corporate contact information, the business entity must disclose certain affiliate entities and affiliated individuals. These affiliates include corporate parents, operating subsidiaries, operating subsidiaries of their corporate parents, persons with a significant ownership interest or distributive shares, executive employees, and spouses of any of these affiliated individuals. However, any entities or individuals prohibited by federal law from making contributions or expenditures in elections do not need to be included in the business registration.
In addition to this initial registration, the registration must be updated quarterly to account for any changes to the entities or that list of affiliates, and, if there is a bid or proposal pending, it must be updated within seven days of any changes that occur. This constant maintenance continues for up to two years following the expiration or termination of the contracts. Failure to maintain this registration could result in voiding all active contracts with the state or its agencies.
Additional requirements of the registration include providing notice to political committees in receipt of contributions from the registered entity and their affiliates, disclosures to the state agency and the Illinois Secretary of State of the register entities’ lobbying activity in the state, and certifications of your compliance with these registration requirements.
These business entity registrations are complex and contain pitfalls if not carefully and constantly maintained. So, it is important to familiarize yourself with each of these requirements and to constantly review your registration to ensure full compliance.

---

Comply with state and local procurement lobbying rules. Our online guidebooks make it easy to view regulations all in one place. Learn more here.